Welcome
   Home | Texts by category | | Quick Search:   
Authors
Works by Plato
Pages of parmenides



Previous | Next
                  

parmenides   


difference in the others, but in the one.

Clearly so.

Moreover, the one that is not is something and partakes of

relation to "that," and "this," and "these," and the like, and is an

attribute of "this"; for the one, or the others than the one, could

not have been spoken of, nor could any attribute or relative of the

one that is not have been or been spoken of, nor could it have been

said to be anything, if it did not partake of "some," or of the

other relations just now mentioned.

True.

Being, then, cannot be ascribed to the one, since it is not; but the

one that is not may or rather must participate in many things, if it

and nothing else is not; if, however, neither the one nor the one that

is not is supposed not to be, and we are speaking of something of a

different nature, we can predicate nothing of it. But supposing that

the one that is not and nothing else is not, then it must

participate in the predicate "that," and in many others.

Certainly.

And it will have unlikeness in relation to the others, for the

others being different from the one will be of a different kind.

Certainly.

And are not things of a different kind also other in kind?

Of course.

And are not things other in kind unlike?

They are unlike.

And if they are unlike the one, that which they are unlike will

clearly be unlike them?

Clearly so.

Then the one will have unlikeness in respect of which the others are

unlike it?

That would seem to be true.

And if unlikeness to other things is attributed to it, it must

Previous | Next
Site Search